Sue of Adobe by US Government Over Hidden Fees and Subscription Cancellation Issues

Introduction

The US government has taken legal action against Adobe, accusing the tech giant of deceptive practices regarding subscription fees and cancellation processes. The lawsuit, filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in San Jose, California, highlights issues that have allegedly harmed consumers.

Key Allegations

Hidden Fees and Cancellations

The FTC’s complaint alleges that Adobe conceals significant termination fees within its popular “annual paid monthly” subscription plan. These fees, sometimes amounting to hundreds of dollars, are buried in the fine print or hidden behind textboxes and hyperlinks. According to the complaint, Adobe charges early termination fees calculated as 50 percent of the remaining payments when consumers cancel within the first year.

Cancellation Process

Adobe is also accused of making it unnecessarily difficult for customers to cancel their subscriptions. Online cancellation requires navigating through multiple pages, while phone cancellations often result in disconnections and repeated conversations with multiple representatives, who reportedly offer “resistance and delay.”

Executives Named in the Lawsuit

The lawsuit names two Adobe executives as defendants: David Wadhwani, president of digital media business, and Maninder Sawhney, senior vice president in digital sales. The FTC claims these practices have trapped customers into year-long subscriptions with hidden fees and numerous cancellation obstacles.

FTC’s Stance

Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s consumer protection bureau, stated, “Adobe trapped customers into year-long subscriptions through hidden early termination fees and numerous cancellation hurdles. Americans are tired of companies hiding the ball during subscription signup and then putting up roadblocks when they try to cancel.”

Defense 

Dana Rao, Adobe’s general counsel and chief trust officer, responded to the allegations, asserting that Adobe will contest the FTC’s claims in court. Rao defended the company’s subscription model, stating, “Subscription services are convenient, flexible, and cost-effective, allowing users to choose the plan that best fits their needs, timeline, and budget. We are transparent with the terms and conditions of our subscription agreements and have a simple cancellation process.”

Financial Impact

Subscriptions are a significant revenue stream for Adobe, accounting for $4.92 billion, or 95 percent, of Adobe’s $5.18 billion revenue in the quarter ending March 1. This underscores the importance of the subscription model to Adobe’s business operations.

Legal Impliments

Violation of Federal Law

The FTC has accused Adobe of violating the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, a 2010 federal law that prohibits merchants from imposing charges, including for automatic subscription renewals, unless they clearly disclose material terms and obtain customers’ informed consent.

Lawsuit Details

The lawsuit seeks civil penalties, an injunction against further misconduct, and other remedies. The case is titled U.S. v. Adobe Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-03630.

Conclusion

This legal action against Adobe highlights ongoing concerns about transparency and fairness in subscription services. The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for Adobe and set a precedent for how companies manage subscription fees and cancellations in the future.